
So… Microsoft Windows Vista, formerly Longhorn, hit the streets today, and I’ve finally had the opportunity to try it out out at various computer stores. This isn’t going to be an in-depth review (you can find lots of those elsewhere on the web), but just my initial observations and comments from a Mac user’s perspective.
The first thing you notice is that the user interface (UI) has seen a major graphic overhaul, and it is just as impressive eye-candy-wise as it is needed after 6 years of stagnation. Minimized web browser windows show the contents in a medium-sized thumbnail (Live icons) when you move the cursor over them in the Task Bar. I much like the color adjustments you can make in the Explorer (Windows’ counterpart of the Finder) windows - that certainly appeals to my aesthetic side.
Side note: It’s annoying that Apple is so conservative in regards to keeping the OS X user interface consistent from Mac to Mac, that you can’t modify the look of your UI - you are limited to fiddling with the text selection colors… wholly inadequate, Apple! You have to use 3rd party software to do anything more serious with the interface on your Mac. (Anyway, lets see if OS X 10.5 with it’s new ‘Illuminous’ interface will change that).
While the menus of Vista in general look smoother than XP due to the new graphics system, the Start Menu (well, I guess it’s just the Windows Menu now, since it doesn’t say “Start” anymore!) has been crippled a bit, because the icons next to “My Computer”, “Documents”, “Network places” and so on have been removed. This will surely confuse new users, because of the lack of visual cues to what it is you’re clicking.
The Task Manager has been enhanced a bit, and a more comprehensive resource monitor (for monitoring the load on CPU, disk, memory and network) has been added as an button you can click in the Task Manager.
Now, the wildcards in the Vista equation are reliability and security. Vista is based on Windows Server 2003, which is based on Windows XP, which in turn is based on on Windows 2000. While Windows 2000 was the best and most reliable Windows version Microsoft has ever made, it goes without saying that MS added a lot of crap in the step from 2000 to XP. Windows 2003 cleaned some of it up and improved reliability (they did, after all, advertise it as a server OS…), but now, Vista yet again adds a lot of more or less superfluous features - and a lot of system code that has not been extensively tested by the *whole* world of PC users outside the gates of Redmond.
With 10 years time of Windows experience under the belt, and even longer as an amused onlooker from behind the protective screen of my Mac, I can attest to that I simply do not trust Microsoft when it comes to the sanctity of my computer and the security of my data and privacy (and I honestly don’t give a shit about Jim Allchin supposedly letting his 7-year old kid play with the computer unsupervised. Like most MS execs, he is full of crap). Microsoft has time and time again shown us that they do not value the privacy and security of their customers, other than as fancy buzzwords on their press releases. Over the years, they’ve churned out lots of software products which were essentially beta-quality, and let the end users struggle with the bugs, horrors and oddities.
Plus, with the more aggressive inclusion of DRM, “Trusted Computing” and Software Activation, it is clear as crystal that Microsoft is intensifying the war against the user. “Trusted Computing” is an oxymoron - Microsoft does not trust you - why should you trust them?
In regards to new features, it is obvious where Microsoft gets its ideas from: Apple. The sleek new graphics system for Vista, Aero, is just a remake of Apple’s Quartz Extreme, the Sidebar and its Gadgets is a remake of Apple’s Dashboard and its Widgets, the BitLocker drive encryption mechanism is a recycled Apple’s FileVault, and the new Resource Monitor is an adaptation of Apple’s Activity Monitor. Those are the first obvious similarities I could find with the short time of trying VIsta out, but I’m sure that there are more.
In essence, it is as always, very clear that Microsoft’s research division is named “Apple Computer”. BillyBoy Inc. has indeed been very busy ripping off Apple!
Summary: Vista is, for most users, an eye-candy update to Windows XP, and granted, it looks good (but, as described above, they had some very good… ah… “inspiration”). But with previous experiences to consider, there is no way whatsoever I’ll install this OS on any computer which carries any important productive role, at least not in the short term. At earliest, I’ll consider playing with it for real in a year, when the worst bugs are ironed out. And I will certainly not use Vista before the cracker community has produced working cracks for Vista, which disables or surgically removes the parts of the OS that would give my anything less than full access to and control over my personal computer.
In short: Save your money and save yourself some headaches. Wait out the upgrade to Vista for at least a year.