So now, I’m The Libertarian
Wednesday, May 28th, 2008Right. It may not have the same verbal kick that some other title has, but at least it’s truthful. Blogs with the title “The (insert some modifier or qualifier HERE) *something*” are a dime a dozen these days, and besides, it’s mostly hollow PR to differentiate youself in some insignificant way from others sharing your chosen label.
So why would I call myself just “The Libertarian” instead of “The Pragmatic Libertarian”?
For several reasons.
For one, it implies that other libertarians than myself are not pragmatic, but rather ideological (and the connotations of that today is that one such is with his or her head in the clouds and removed from the realities of the world, which is bullshit, because in many areas pertaining to politics, they have their feet more solidly planted on the ground than most “main stream” Democrats, Republicans, Progressives, Moderates and whatnot).
Metapoint: Pragmatism is ironically itself an ideology. Chew on that, you pragmatists, HA!
Second: I’m not too sure of how “non-ideological” i myself (or anyone else for that matter) should be to qualify to be “pragmatic”. As I see it the opposite of (pure) ideology would be (pure) pragmatism, which directly translates to pure oppertunism, and that means doing anything that would increase your power and reputation in the eyes of the public, no matter how much you’d have to prostitute yourself, betray your friends, allies and guiding ideals. As such, pure pragmatism is absolutely repugnant to me.
Additionally, go read Hayek’s “Why I am not a Conservative” for some more elaboration on ideology vs pragmatism.
Third, I may also change the Libertarian label as well, because the established, state-political Libertarian movement has been in decline the last few years in regards to ideology and integrity (and as such, taking the public perception, to the degree that there is one such of libertarianism, with it). From the summaries I got from US friends who followed the recent LNC (Libertarian National Convention), the LP is now aiming for a degree of moderation where it would indeed seem that they are “Republicans who want to smoke weed”. The intentions is no doubt good (MUCH better than those naaasty Demmies and Repugs, aye!), but the rhetoric is basically the same. (The NeoLibertarians, who are pro-war and more pragmatic than the rest of us pie-in-the-sky extremists, do indeed, in conjunction with the RLP’ers, seem to get their way.) And after a few years of being a libertarian, if there is something I despise, it’s justifying your own failures, inaction, incompetence and outright crimes with “your good intentions”. I want results, not sweet-sounding crap-talk.
Is the LP a good way to raise awareness about the libertarian cause? Initially it may seem so, but when you consider how much time, money and effort goes into busting into the public awareness, by means of advertisements, qualifying for the ballot, money for publicity - and plain, saying the stuff people want to hear (which in 90% of the case is bullshit or plain immoral from a freedom standpoint), I say - lets use the energy and resources elsewhere. “The Free State Project might be one such, but i doubt it. It could much too easily be labelled by the anti-libertarians as a militant takeover, yada yada, and that would be the end of that.
If you want to have a more libertarian world, my guess is that local independence and subversion efforts against the Big Government is the way to go. (Oh - and resisting the temptation to save others from themselves, as well.)
And, if you have a better suggestion for a self-label, let’s hear it.











